Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) in Industrial Automation Projects
How programmable logic controllers (plcs) are selected, sized, and integrated in industrial automation projects.
Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) in Industrial Automation Projects
Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) remain the core control platform in most industrial automation projects, from machine skids and process skids to full plant-wide control architectures. In practice, PLC selection is not just about I/O count or brand preference; it is a systems engineering decision that affects functional safety, electrical compliance, cybersecurity, maintainability, and lifecycle cost. For projects delivered under European practice, PLCs must be evaluated within the broader requirements of CE marking, the Machinery Directive/Regulation context, EMC, low-voltage safety, and increasingly IEC 62443-aligned cyber expectations.
How PLCs are selected in automation projects
The selection process starts with the control philosophy and the I/O architecture. Engineers typically define the process type, scan-time needs, safety functions, communications, environmental conditions, and expected change rate. For example, a packaging line may prioritize high-speed motion and EtherNet/IP or PROFINET integration, while a water treatment plant may prioritize remote I/O, redundancy, and long-term service availability.
Common PLC families used in industrial projects include Siemens SIMATIC S7-1200/S7-1500, Rockwell Allen-Bradley CompactLogix/ControlLogix, Schneider Electric Modicon M241/M340/M580, ABB AC500, Beckhoff CX series, and Omron NX/NJ. Selection is usually driven by ecosystem fit: native protocol support, engineering software, local support, spare parts strategy, and the ability to meet project-specific standards.
From a compliance standpoint, the PLC itself is typically part of the control system assessed under EN ISO 12100 risk reduction, IEC 60204-1 electrical equipment of machines, and the machinery control system safety requirements in ISO 13849-1 or IEC 62061 where safety functions are involved. For cyber requirements, IEC 62443-3-3 is increasingly used to define system security requirements, especially for networked PLCs.
Sizing the PLC: I/O, memory, performance, and expansion
PLC sizing should be based on a disciplined allowance method rather than a direct match to the initial I/O list. A good engineering rule is to reserve 15–30% spare digital I/O and 20–40% spare analog and network capacity for future modifications. For CPU sizing, evaluate scan time, task cycle, and communication load. If the application includes PID loops, motion, or fast interlocks, confirm that the controller’s execution time remains comfortably below the process requirement.
A simplified capacity check can be expressed as:
$$\text{Total I/O required} = \text{Present I/O} + \text{Spare I/O} + \text{Future phase I/O}$$
For example, if a skid requires 180 present points, 30 spare points, and 40 points for phase 2, the target design basis is 250 points. This supports cabinet expansion without forcing a CPU migration later.
Memory and communication sizing should also reflect data logging, alarm handling, recipe management, and remote access. In larger systems, distributed I/O and remote racks are often better than centralizing all signals in one cabinet. This reduces panel wiring, improves modularity, and can simplify EMC management under EN 61000-6-2 and EN 61000-6-4 compatibility expectations.
Integration with electrical panels, networks, and field devices
PLC integration begins in the panel design. The controller must be installed with adequate segregation, earthing, and environmental protection in line with IEC 60204-1 and EN 61439 where applicable to assemblies. Power supply redundancy, surge protection, and proper 24 VDC distribution are essential, especially when mixing control, instrumentation, and communication devices.
Network architecture is equally important. PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, Modbus TCP, PROFIBUS, and EtherCAT are common choices, but the selected PLC family should align with the plant’s standard protocol and the integrator’s diagnostic model. For multi-vendor facilities, gateway use should be minimized unless necessary, because each translation layer adds failure modes and diagnostic complexity.
Safety-related PLCs or safety CPUs should be used where the risk assessment requires safety functions such as emergency stop, guard locking, or safe torque off. In such cases, the architecture and validation approach must align with ISO 13849-1 or IEC 62061, and the relevant safety-related parameters must be documented in the technical file.
Testing, FAT, SAT, and compliance evidence
PLC testing should be staged across software simulation, factory acceptance testing (FAT), and site acceptance testing (SAT). FAT verifies logic, alarms, interlocks, communications, and fail-safe behavior before shipment. SAT confirms field wiring, device identification, network performance, and integration with the actual process equipment.
For European projects, test evidence should support the CE technical documentation package. That typically includes electrical schematics, software version control, I/O lists, risk assessment references, and validation records. Where safety functions are implemented, proof test and validation records should show that the achieved performance level or safety integrity level meets the design target.
Cybersecurity testing is increasingly expected as well. IEC 62443-4-2 device requirements and IEC 62443-3-3 system requirements can be used to define access control, account management, logging, and network segmentation expectations. For critical infrastructure projects, this is especially relevant when the PLC is remotely accessible or connected to SCADA, historians, or cloud services.
Quick comparison of common PLC family choices
| PLC family | Typical strength | Best fit | Selection note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens S7-1500 | Strong diagnostics, broad industrial ecosystem | Process plants, OEM lines, European projects | Often favored where PROFINET and long-term support are priorities |
| Rockwell ControlLogix | High performance, large installed base in North America | Discrete manufacturing, large skids, plant-wide EtherNet/IP | Strong where the site standard is Allen-Bradley |
| Schneider Modicon M580 | Integrated Ethernet architecture, process-oriented features | Utilities, infrastructure, process automation | Useful where Modbus and Ethernet-centric design are preferred |
| Beckhoff CX/NX | High-speed control and modular software architecture | Machine automation, motion, compact high-performance systems | Often selected for advanced deterministic control needs |
Practical project rules for engineers and buyers
Procurement teams should verify not only the CPU model but also lifecycle status, firmware policy, spare availability, and licensing model. Engineering teams should confirm that the PLC family supports the site’s required standards, including network segmentation, timestamping, diagnostics, and remote maintenance controls. Panel builders should ensure that cabinet thermal performance, EMC layout, and terminal strategy are aligned with the controller’s installation requirements.
In well-run projects, the PLC is not chosen in isolation. It is selected as part of an integrated control package that includes the electrical panel, field instrumentation, safety functions, SCADA interface, and commissioning strategy. That is the difference between a controller that merely runs and a control system that can be safely operated, maintained, and expanded over its lifecycle.
If you are defining a PLC architecture for a new project or modernizing an existing one, discuss the requirements with us via /contact.
Other components for Industrial Automation
Other services using Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs)
Frequently asked questions
How do I select a PLC platform for a multi-vendor industrial automation project with European compliance requirements?
Start by defining the control architecture, I/O density, network protocols, safety requirements, and lifecycle support, then verify the PLC family supports the required environmental and EMC conditions. For European projects, the control panel and machine control design should align with IEC 60204-1, EN 61439 for assemblies, and EMC requirements under the relevant IEC/EN standards; for functional safety, confirm compatibility with IEC 61508 and IEC 62061 or ISO 13849-1 where applicable.
What PLC programming standards should be used to keep code portable across OEMs and integrators?
The most common cross-platform programming standard is IEC 61131-3, which defines languages such as Ladder Diagram, Function Block Diagram, Structured Text, and Sequential Function Chart. Using IEC 61131-3 conventions improves portability and maintainability, but engineers should still validate vendor-specific libraries, task scheduling, and data type behavior before deployment.
How should PLC I/O be engineered for long-distance field wiring in industrial plants?
For long cable runs, engineer voltage drop, signal integrity, shielding, grounding, and segregation from power conductors, and select appropriate analog or digital I/O modules with diagnostic capabilities. Wiring practices should follow IEC 60204-1 and EN 60204-1 for machine electrical equipment, while panel internal wiring and conductor selection should also respect the assembly requirements of EN 61439 and applicable local electrical codes.
What is the best way to integrate PLCs with SCADA systems on global projects?
Use a clear communications architecture with defined tag naming, time synchronization, alarm philosophy, and cybersecurity segmentation between control and supervisory layers. Common integration protocols include OPC UA, Modbus TCP, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, and IEC 60870-5-104 depending on the application, while SCADA alarm management should be aligned with ISA 18.2 and IEC 62682.
How do I design PLC panels to meet European panel-building and machine-safety expectations?
The panel should be designed as a complete assembly with verified short-circuit withstand, temperature rise, creepage and clearance, protective earthing, and proper component coordination. In Europe, EN 61439 governs low-voltage switchgear and controlgear assemblies, while machine electrical equipment is covered by IEC/EN 60204-1; safety-related control circuits must be assessed against IEC 62061 or ISO 13849-1 as required by the risk assessment.
What cybersecurity controls should be applied to PLCs connected to industrial networks?
Apply network segmentation, least-privilege access, secure remote access, change control, and asset inventory management, and disable unused services and ports. For industrial control systems, IEC 62443 is the primary reference series for security zoning, system requirements, and component hardening, and it is commonly used on EPC projects to define vendor cybersecurity deliverables.
How should redundancy be specified for PLCs in critical process applications?
Specify redundancy based on process criticality, acceptable downtime, and failure modes for the CPU, power supply, communication network, and I/O architecture. Redundant control solutions should be evaluated with the overall risk and availability targets in mind, and if safety functions are involved, the architecture must still satisfy IEC 61508 or the applicable sector standard rather than relying on redundancy alone.
What documentation should be delivered for PLC-based automation projects to support commissioning and handover?
A complete deliverable set should include the control philosophy, I/O list, network architecture, PLC program backup, cause-and-effect matrix, alarm list, FAT/SAT procedures, and as-built drawings. For European projects, the documentation package should support conformity with IEC 60204-1, EN 61439, and the project’s functional safety and cybersecurity requirements, with change records maintained for lifecycle traceability.